Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Less than 5% of movies actually show a net income (or net profit as the article calls it). It's called Hollywood Accounting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

Summary:

-Studios create a subsidiary corporation for each movie and they almost never show a profit.

-The studios charge the subsidiary service fees for services performed like distribution, which lowers net income to zero or less.

-They do this to avoid taxation and paying royalties to actors.

Quote from wikipedia: "Because of this, net points are sometimes referred to as "monkey points," a term attributed to Eddie Murphy, who is said to have also stated that only a fool would accept net points in his or her contract."

There are many more cases like this involving high profile people including Peter Jackson:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting#Examples



The link from the Wikipedia page to a leaked receipt from Harry Potter shows an example of this.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100708/02510310122.shtml

Geez, a $57 million dollar loss in interest. How is that even possible?


The effects of this accounting practice looks a lot like the claimed effect of piracy...


This is a very good insight. I wonder how often the figures that get flashed around about how much money Hollywood is losing due to piracy are drawn directly from these fictionalizations created for an entirely separate purpose.


Another example of how criminal it is: A major studio will pay Technicolor $25 million annually for an exclusivity fee. Then Technicolor will charge inflated rates to the studios, so the films will appear to lose money.


You must mean that Technicolor pays the studio first, then overcharges later.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: