Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you suggesting that they have no choice but to completely stop locating the user as there's absolutely no way they could offer non-lane specific navigation? The vast majority of it would be identical and I'm sure they could easily and gracefully degrade to that when strictly necessary.


How much does a company need to degrade a service - at potentially great cost - to be compliant before they can claim it then would be better not to provide the service at all to customers unwilling to share data?

I am not claiming that this is where Google needs to draw the line in the sand - but there obviously is such a limit to these considerations.


Google doesn't have lane data for every road in the world, yet clearly navigation is already implemented to work without it?

I don't know why people throw up random excuses for companies instead of accepting the simplest answer - they want as much data as they can.


Google was able to provide the service before, now they patched it out. So clearly it is not a question of ability to gracefully degrade but of willingness.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: