Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Cameron doesn't give a crap. He just needs his latest shot of money.


It seems little wild to assume the maker of a movie would care less about the movie than a random mob on the internet (instead of maybe just having a different opinion) but the assumption does feel very internet.


Depends on if he cares more about his current movie project(s) than his old ones. He still needs $$

I bet even Kubrick would have been tempted if the situation came about.


To me, thinking of it as temptation is an issue.

Society collectively deciding for creators what is supposedly the right thing to do with or the right way to think about their work is so strange.


What is strange is the notion that the original creator should retain full control of a creation once released.


That would indeed be a very strange notion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: