Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder if that's part of the reason for their algorithms to push the same videos to everyone, they're already cached at the edge so it costs them nothing?


More popular works are more likely to be enjoyable to more people. There is no really objective measure of quality for any creative work, and taste doesn't scale, so publishers bias for popularity as it's one of the few things they can understand.


> taste doesn't scale

The motto of so many social networks. Even if they don't know it.


The majority will enjoy and like whatever is pushed on them. Decades of radio and TV should be enough evidence for this. Music or video is not popular because people like it, but because somebody decided to make it popular by pushing it on people.


> taste doesn't scale

Wow, I’m going to put this on a wall.


They’re cached because they’re popular, not popular because they’re cached .


I would imagine that's too insignificant to factor into that particular calculation.


I would imagine it's an unintended side effect of the "people recently watched this so it's relevant" part of the algorithm.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: