I have a tightly-defined universe of discourse here, and you are operating almost completely outside it. Why is your engagement with my comment relevant beyond the connection to DRAKON?
So far, I've seen you write about cultists and Buran and, now, how sequence diagrams and state diagrams are superior. That final bit could admittedly make for interesting conversation, but I've heretofore not seen significant substantiation from you or, hell, any interrogation from you why I even use DRAKON.
Dare I say it, but I feel like I've been the target of your trauma response here, and I don't exactly appreciate it.
I have a tightly-defined universe of discourse here, and you are operating almost completely outside it. Why is your engagement with my comment relevant beyond the connection to DRAKON?
So far, I've seen you write about cultists and Buran and, now, how sequence diagrams and state diagrams are superior. That final bit could admittedly make for interesting conversation, but I've heretofore not seen significant substantiation from you or, hell, any interrogation from you why I even use DRAKON.
Dare I say it, but I feel like I've been the target of your trauma response here, and I don't exactly appreciate it.