In a documentary about a homeless encampment (in america) I viewed not long ago, the residents had spliced into a lamp post to provide power to their and their neighbours tents. It was truly a hacker inspired, move fast and break things approach.
This research seems to be inspired by the same content and appears to be an attempt to commercialise the same technology.
I can’t wait for people and companies to realize “oh no, we only wanted to give easy electricity access to rich people’s cars, not to the homeless people, let’s add another layer of dystopia to fix that”
I don’t know if I’d describe safeguards against misusing electrical systems as dystopian. If a system is made for a specific purpose and misuse is highly dangerous and disruptive, I’d certainly support reasonable safeguards.
And after they implement the dystopia they'll inevitably use it to go after petty deviance by people who are rich enough to pay fines and leave the homeless who were the pretext for the dystopia un-bothered except just enough to let the useful idiots continue to think that that is in fact the purpose of the system.
Not sure if it’s more dystopian to not be able to have nice things (easy EV charging) or to prohibit the homeless from destructively misusing the EV chargers.
This research seems to be inspired by the same content and appears to be an attempt to commercialise the same technology.